Do Chinese and American contributions in top journals have an equal citation potential?
DING Jielan(丁洁兰)1,2; ROUSSEAU Ronald3,4
刊名chinese journal of library and information science
2015-06-27
卷号8期号:2页码:1-10
关键词Nature Science Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Chinese articles Mann-Whitney test
通讯作者ronald rousseau (email: ronald.rousseau@kuleuven.be).
中文摘要purpose: we want to contribute to the evaluation of chinese research, focusing on contributions in top journals.

design/methodology/approach: using a mann-whitney test we investigate if contributions in nature, science or the proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america (pnas) by chinese or american authors only, i.e. articles for which all authors have a chinese or an american address, have a different citation potential.

findings: there is no reason to state that chinese and american contributions in these top journals have a different citation potential.

research limitations: because of the small numbers involved we were not able to make a distinction between publications in nature, science or the proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america.

practical implications: these results suggest that the better chinese research results are of a similar level as those by american colleagues.
 
originality/value: it is well-known that the number of citations per publication by chinese authors is still lagging with respect to leading scientific nations and in particular compared with the usa. we have shown that this difference does not necessarily hold in contributions in nature, science or the proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america.
英文摘要purpose: we want to contribute to the evaluation of chinese research, focusing on contributions in top journals.

design/methodology/approach: using a mann-whitney test we investigate if contributions in nature, science or the proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america (pnas) by chinese or american authors only, i.e. articles for which all authors have a chinese or an american address, have a different citation potential.

findings: there is no reason to state that chinese and american contributions in these top journals have a different citation potential.

research limitations: because of the small numbers involved we were not able to make a distinction between publications in nature, science or the proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america.

practical implications: these results suggest that the better chinese research results are of a similar level as those by american colleagues.
 
originality/value: it is well-known that the number of citations per publication by chinese authors is still lagging with respect to leading scientific nations and in particular compared with the usa. we have shown that this difference does not necessarily hold in contributions in nature, science or the proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america.
学科主题新闻学与传播学 ; 图书馆、情报与文献学
收录类别其他
原文出处http://www.chinalibraries.net
语种英语
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/7806]  
专题文献情报中心_Journal of Data and Information Science_Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science-2015
作者单位1.National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3.Information and Library Science (IBW), University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp B-2000, Belgium
4.Department of Mathematics, KU Leuven, Leuven B-3000, Belgium
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
DING Jielan,ROUSSEAU Ronald. Do Chinese and American contributions in top journals have an equal citation potential?[J]. chinese journal of library and information science,2015,8(2):1-10.
APA DING Jielan,&ROUSSEAU Ronald.(2015).Do Chinese and American contributions in top journals have an equal citation potential?.chinese journal of library and information science,8(2),1-10.
MLA DING Jielan,et al."Do Chinese and American contributions in top journals have an equal citation potential?".chinese journal of library and information science 8.2(2015):1-10.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace