Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct
Lin, Xiao-Xiao1,2; Si, Shang-Wen3; Gao, Rui-Rui1,2; Sun, Ya-Bin1,2; Wang, Yu-Zheng1,2; Wang, Ning1,2; Luo, Fei1,2; Wang, Jin-Yan1,2
刊名COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH
2020-07-14
卷号44页码:1091–1105
关键词Interpretation bias Depression Ambiguity Judgement bias test Approach-avoidance
ISSN号0147-5916
DOI10.1007/s10608-020-10133-0
产权排序1
文献子类实证研究
英文摘要

Background There has been a recent surge of interest in the development of the Judgement Bias Test (JBT) as a translational assay and objective measure of depressive interpretation bias. Judgement bias, namely the tendency of favoring an approach/avoidance response towards ambiguous cues, is thought to reflect a biased interpretation or anticipation of the cues. However, no study has examined the relationship between judgement bias and depressive interpretation bias. Methods We validated the JBT against established measurements of interpretation bias in a college sample (Study 1) and an adolescent sample (Study 2). Results In both samples, a negative judgement bias was significantly associated with a depressive interpretation bias. However, the strength of the associations was only moderate and failed to meet the minimum qualification of convergent validity. Conclusions Our results suggest that judgement bias and interpretation bias might be related but distinct. The JBT should not be used as an indirect assessment of interpretation bias in its current form, and it would be premature to claim that animal studies using the JBT could inform our understanding of cognitive biases in mood disorders. Nevertheless, the JBT might be useful for studying specific mechanisms, such as reward processing under ambiguity.

WOS关键词NEGATIVE INTERPRETATION BIAS ; HAMILTON-PLEASURE SCALE ; INVENTORY-SHORT VERSION ; EMOTIONAL DISORDERS ; COGNITIVE BIAS ; RISK-TAKING ; AFFECT SCHEDULE ; ANXIETY ; MOOD ; VALIDATION
WOS研究方向Psychology
语种英语
出版者SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
WOS记录号WOS:000548466400001
资助机构NNSF (National Natural Science Foundation of China) ; Scientific Foundation of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences ; CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology ; initiation fund of the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/32255]  
专题心理研究所_中国科学院心理健康重点实验室
通讯作者Wang, Jin-Yan
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, CAS Key Lab Mental Hlth, 16 Lincui Rd, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
3.Beijing 101 Middle Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Lin, Xiao-Xiao,Si, Shang-Wen,Gao, Rui-Rui,et al. Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct[J]. COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH,2020,44:1091–1105.
APA Lin, Xiao-Xiao.,Si, Shang-Wen.,Gao, Rui-Rui.,Sun, Ya-Bin.,Wang, Yu-Zheng.,...&Wang, Jin-Yan.(2020).Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct.COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH,44,1091–1105.
MLA Lin, Xiao-Xiao,et al."Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct".COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH 44(2020):1091–1105.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace