An improved beam splitting method for intensity modulated proton therapy
Yang, Jinhe1,2; He, Peng2; Wang, Hui2; Sun, Guangyao2; Zheng, Huaqing2; Jia, Jing2
刊名PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
2020-09-21
卷号65
关键词beam splitting KylinRay IMPT pencil beam algorithm TOPAS proton therapy
ISSN号0031-9155
DOI10.1088/1361-6560/ab9b55
通讯作者Wang, Hui(theonlyhuiwang@gmail.com)
英文摘要The pencil beam algorithm (PBA) has become the predominant dose calculation method in proton therapy, due to its high level of efficiency. However, density heterogeneity decreases the accuracy of PBA. To improve PBA's accuracy, a beam splitting method is used to divide the original scanning beam into multiple thinner beamlets. Beam splitting should ensure that the beamlets' summed fluence is as close to the original beam fluence as possible, while keeping the spatial variance of beamlets small, and minimizing the number of beamlets. In this work, the generalized differential evolution (GDE) algorithm is utilized for the optimal scheme. Under reasonable constraints for the radius and weight of beamlets, several schemes are optimized via the GDE algorithm. In order to achieve a trade-off between accuracy and calculation speed, three hexagon-based schemes, which split the original beam into 7, 13, and 19 beamlets, respectively, are proposed and compared with the scheme of Raystation 4.5. The fluence distribution calculated by the schemes with 13 beamlets and 19 beamlets are demonstrated to be more accurate than the Raystation scheme, which has 19 beamlets, with a maximum absolute difference between the summed beamlets fluence and the original beam fluence of 2.12%, and 0.93%, respectively. Furthermore, beam splitting schemes are implemented into a proton dose calculation algorithm based on the KylinRay-IMPT TPS. These schemes, based on the dose algorithm, are compared with the Monte Carlo program TOPAS 3.2 in slab geometry with lateral heterogeneity. The dose, calculated by the dose algorithm using a scheme of 13 beamlets, shows a good agreement with the dose from TOPAS. In addition, an abdominal geometry is used for further verification. Gamma analysis passing rates greater than 99.7% are observed, with a 2%/2 mm criterion. Thus, the accuracy and effectiveness of the improved beam splitting method are preliminarily verified.
资助项目National Natural Science Foundation of China[11 605 233] ; Anhui province project[18 030 801 135] ; Chinese Academy of Sciences project[XXH13506-104] ; Special Project of Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Industrialization Fund
WOS关键词CARLO DOSE CALCULATION ; ALGORITHM ; RADIOTHERAPY ; SYSTEM
WOS研究方向Engineering ; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
语种英语
出版者IOP PUBLISHING LTD
WOS记录号WOS:000573533000001
资助机构National Natural Science Foundation of China ; Anhui province project ; Chinese Academy of Sciences project ; Special Project of Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Industrialization Fund
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://ir.hfcas.ac.cn:8080/handle/334002/104359]  
专题中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院
通讯作者Wang, Hui
作者单位1.Anhui Univ, Inst Phys Sci & Informat Technol, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
2.Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Neutron & Radiat Safety, Inst Nucl Energy Safety Technol, Hefei 230031, Anhui, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Yang, Jinhe,He, Peng,Wang, Hui,et al. An improved beam splitting method for intensity modulated proton therapy[J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY,2020,65.
APA Yang, Jinhe,He, Peng,Wang, Hui,Sun, Guangyao,Zheng, Huaqing,&Jia, Jing.(2020).An improved beam splitting method for intensity modulated proton therapy.PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY,65.
MLA Yang, Jinhe,et al."An improved beam splitting method for intensity modulated proton therapy".PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 65(2020).
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace