A comparative study of an expert knowledge-based model and two data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping | |
Zhu, A-Xing1,2,3,4; Miao, Yamin1,2,3; Wang, Rongxun5; Zhu, Tongxin5; Deng, Yongcui1; Liu, Junzhi1,2,3; Yang, Lin6; Qin, Cheng-Zhi6; Hong, Haoyuan1,2,3 | |
刊名 | CATENA |
2018-07-01 | |
卷号 | 166页码:317-327 |
关键词 | Data-driven models Expert knowledge-based model Landslide susceptibility GIS Logistic regression Artificial neural network |
ISSN号 | 0341-8162 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.003 |
通讯作者 | Liu, Junzhi(liujunzhi@njnu.edu.cn) ; Hong, Haoyuan(hong_haoyuan@outlook.com) |
英文摘要 | In this study, an expert knowledge-based model, a logistic regression model, and an artificial neural network model were compared for their accuracy and portability in landslide susceptibility mapping. Two study areas (the Kaixian and the Three Gorges areas in China) were selected for this comparison based on their well-known, high landslide hazard. To evaluate the performance of these models and to minimize the impact of the particularity of a study area on model performance, cross-applications of three models between the two study areas were conducted. When the Kaixian area was used as a model development area, prediction accuracy for the expert knowledge-based model, the logistic regression model, and the artificial neural network model were 71.5%, 81.0% and 100.0%, respectively. The high prediction accuracy of the two data-driven models were expected because the observed landslide occurrence used in training the models were also used to validate their respective performance, while the expert knowledge-based model did not use these observations for training. The perfect accuracy for the neural network model can also be attributed to its over-prediction of the susceptibility. When breaking the susceptibility into four classes: very low susceptibility (0-0.25), low susceptibility (0.25-0.5), high susceptibility (0.5-0.75), and very high susceptibility (0.75-1), the observed landslide density at the very high susceptibility level is 0.303/km(2), 0.212/km(2), and 0.195/km(2) for the expert knowledge-based model, the logistic regression model, and the artificial neural network model, respectively. This suggests that the expert knowledge-based model was much better than the other two data-driven models at evaluating landslide occurrence in very high susceptibility areas. When the three models developed in the Kaixian area were applied in the Three Gorges area without any changes, their prediction accuracy dropped to 44.8% for the logistic regression model and 81.6% for the artificial neural network model, while the expert knowledge-based model maintained its initial accuracy level of 82.8%. The landslide density for the very high susceptibility areas in the Three Georges area was 0.275/km(2), 0.082/km(2), and 0.060/Km(2) for the expert knowledge-based model, the logistic model, and the artificial neural network model, respectively. These results indicate that the expert knowledge-based model is more effective at predicting areas with very high susceptibility. When the Three Gorges area was used as a model development area and the Kaixian area was used as the model application area, similar results were obtained Results from the two experiments show that the performance of the logistic regression model and artificial neural network model is not as stable as the expert knowledge-based model when transferred to a new area. This suggests that the expert knowledge-based model is more suitable for landslide susceptibility mapping over large areas. |
资助项目 | National Natural Science Foundation of China[41431177] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[41601413] ; Natural Science Research Program of Jiangsu[BK20150975] ; Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China[14KJA170001] ; National Basic Research Program of China[2015CB954102] ; PAPD program of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions[164320H116] ; University of Wisconsin-Madison ; One-Thousand Talents Program of China |
WOS关键词 | ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS ; 3 GORGES AREA ; SPATIAL PREDICTION MODELS ; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION ; FUZZY-LOGIC ; WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE ; SAMPLING STRATEGIES ; GIS TECHNOLOGY ; YANGTZE-RIVER ; HAZARD |
WOS研究方向 | Geology ; Agriculture ; Water Resources |
语种 | 英语 |
出版者 | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000434238800031 |
资助机构 | National Natural Science Foundation of China ; Natural Science Research Program of Jiangsu ; Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China ; National Basic Research Program of China ; PAPD program of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions ; University of Wisconsin-Madison ; One-Thousand Talents Program of China |
内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/54868] |
专题 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 |
通讯作者 | Liu, Junzhi; Hong, Haoyuan |
作者单位 | 1.Nanjing Normal Univ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China 2.State Key Lab Cultivat Base Geog Environm Evolut, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China 3.Jiangsu Ctr Collaborat Innovat Geog Informat Reso, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China 4.Univ Wisconsin, Dept Geog, Madison, WI 53706 USA 5.Univ Minnesota, Dept Geog, Duluth, MN 55812 USA 6.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Zhu, A-Xing,Miao, Yamin,Wang, Rongxun,et al. A comparative study of an expert knowledge-based model and two data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping[J]. CATENA,2018,166:317-327. |
APA | Zhu, A-Xing.,Miao, Yamin.,Wang, Rongxun.,Zhu, Tongxin.,Deng, Yongcui.,...&Hong, Haoyuan.(2018).A comparative study of an expert knowledge-based model and two data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping.CATENA,166,317-327. |
MLA | Zhu, A-Xing,et al."A comparative study of an expert knowledge-based model and two data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping".CATENA 166(2018):317-327. |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论