QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	A comparison of risk modeling tools and a case study for human health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in contaminated groundwater
	Han, Lu1; Qian, Linbo1; Yan, Jingchun1; Liu, Rongqin2; Du, Yihua3; Chen, Mengfang1
刊名	Environmental science and pollution research
	2016
卷号	23期号:2页码:1234-1245
关键词	Health risk assessment Groundwater Volatile organic compounds Principal component analysis Model validation
ISSN号	0944-1344
DOI	10.1007/s11356-015-5335-4
通讯作者	Chen, mengfang(mfchen@issas.ac.cn)
英文摘要	In order to promote the risk-based strategy in the investigation, assessment, and remediation of chinese brown-field sites, the health and environmental risk assessment (hera) software was developed. it is vital to validate the hera model and compare the inter-model differences of hera model against other available risk assessment tools. this paper discusses the similarities and differences between the risk-based corrective action (rbca) tool kit and the hera model by evaluating the health risk of organic contaminated groundwater sources for a chemical works in china for the first time. consequently, the hera and rbca models yielded the identical results for site-specific assessment criteria (ssac) under the commercial redevelopment. however, the hera estimated more conservative and stringent ssacs under the residential scenario based on the different exposure calculations. the inhalation of indoor vapors was the most predominated exposure pathway for all the volatile organic compounds (vocs) determined using the rbca and hera models. according to the hera model, inhalation of chloroform may cause the highest unacceptable carcinogenic risk at 2.31 x 10(-3) under the residential scenario. therefore, it is recommended that a risk-based remedial strategy be developed to ensure the safe and sustainable redevelopment of the site.
WOS关键词	EXPOSURE ; SUPPORT ; CHINA ; SOILS
WOS研究方向	Environmental Sciences & Ecology
WOS类目	Environmental Sciences
语种	英语
出版者	SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
WOS记录号	WOS:000368200200029
内容类型	期刊论文
URI标识	http://www.corc.org.cn/handle/1471x/2374186
专题	计算机网络信息中心
通讯作者	Chen, Mengfang
作者单位	1.Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Soil Environm & Pollut Remediat, Inst Soil Sci, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China 2.China Univ Geosci, Sch Environm Studies, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China 3.Chinese Acad Sci, Comp Network Informat Ctr, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Han, Lu,Qian, Linbo,Yan, Jingchun,et al. A comparison of risk modeling tools and a case study for human health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in contaminated groundwater[J]. Environmental science and pollution research,2016,23(2):1234-1245.
APA	Han, Lu,Qian, Linbo,Yan, Jingchun,Liu, Rongqin,Du, Yihua,&Chen, Mengfang.(2016).A comparison of risk modeling tools and a case study for human health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in contaminated groundwater.Environmental science and pollution research,23(2),1234-1245.
MLA	Han, Lu,et al."A comparison of risk modeling tools and a case study for human health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in contaminated groundwater".Environmental science and pollution research 23.2(2016):1234-1245.

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。