QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	Individual differences in a switch from risk-averse preferences for gains to risk-seeking preferences for losses: can personality variables predict the risk preferences?
	Li, Shu1; Liu, Chang-Jiang1,2; Shu Li
刊名	JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH
	2008
卷号	11期号:5页码:673-686
关键词	reflection effect framing effect Myers-Briggs Type Indicator gray hair/clouds effect
ISSN号	1366-9877
文献子类	Article
英文摘要	Individual differences on a framing problem and a reflection problem were examined in light of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. The predictions on information processing style, derived from Jungian personality type theory, were tested for the much-discussed framing effect in the Asian Disease Problem and for the reflection effect on which the framing effect presumably depends. As anticipated, the results revealed that business students with higher iNtuition/Extraversion scores and lower Judging score were more likely to be consistently risk-seeking. Conversely, those with higher Sensing/Judging scores were more likely to be consistently risk-averse. Both framing and reflection effects were displayed by those with higher Sensing/Judging scores. However, the second expected result was not supported. Rather, a so-called 'gray hair/clouds' effect (effect name inspired by Medin and Shoben's research in 1988), questioning the validity of risk propensity, was observed and analyzed. The somewhat surprising results and their theoretical and practical implications are discussed.; Individual differences on a framing problem and a reflection problem were examined in light of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. The predictions on information processing style, derived from Jungian personality type theory, were tested for the much-discussed framing effect in the Asian Disease Problem and for the reflection effect on which the framing effect presumably depends. As anticipated, the results revealed that business students with higher iNtuition/Extraversion scores and lower Judging score were more likely to be consistently risk-seeking. Conversely, those with higher Sensing/Judging scores were more likely to be consistently risk-averse. Both framing and reflection effects were displayed by those with higher Sensing/Judging scores. However, the second expected result was not supported. Rather, a so-called 'gray hair/clouds' effect (effect name inspired by Medin and Shoben's research in 1988), questioning the validity of risk propensity, was observed and analyzed. The somewhat surprising results and their theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
学科主题	社会心理学 ; 人格心理学
语种	英语
WOS记录号	WOS:000258082100006
公开日期	2011-08-22
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/5478]
专题	心理研究所_中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010)
通讯作者	Shu Li
作者单位	1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Li, Shu,Liu, Chang-Jiang,Shu Li. Individual differences in a switch from risk-averse preferences for gains to risk-seeking preferences for losses: can personality variables predict the risk preferences?[J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH,2008,11(5):673-686.
APA	Li, Shu,Liu, Chang-Jiang,&Shu Li.(2008).Individual differences in a switch from risk-averse preferences for gains to risk-seeking preferences for losses: can personality variables predict the risk preferences?.JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH,11(5),673-686.
MLA	Li, Shu,et al."Individual differences in a switch from risk-averse preferences for gains to risk-seeking preferences for losses: can personality variables predict the risk preferences?".JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH 11.5(2008):673-686.

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。