Document Type Profiles in Nature, Science, and PNAS: Journal and Country Level | |
Jielan Ding1,2; Per Ahlgren3; Liying Yang1; Ting Yue1 | |
刊名 | journal of data and information science |
2016-09-18 | |
卷号 | 1期号:3页码:27-41 |
关键词 | Country Document type profile Nature Science Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) |
通讯作者 | liying yang (e-mail: yangly@mail.las.ac.cn). |
中文摘要 |
purpose: in this contribution, we want to detect the document type profiles of the three prestigious journals nature, science, and proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states (pnas) with regard to two levels: journal and country. design/methodology/approach: using relative values based on fractional counting, we investigate the distribution of publications across document types at both the journal and country level, and we use (cosine) document type profile similarity values to compare pairs of publication years within countries. findings: nature and science mainly publish editorial material, article, news item and letter, whereas the publications of pnas are heavily concentrated on article. the shares of article for nature and science are decreasing slightly from 1999 to 2014, while the corresponding shares of editorial material are increasing. most studied countries focus on article and letter in nature, but on letter in science and pnas. the document type profiles of some of the studied countries change to a relatively large extent over publication years. research limitations: the main limitation of this research concerns the web of science classification of publications into document types. since the analysis of the paper is based on document types of web of science, the classification in question is not free from errors, and the accuracy of the analysis might be affected. practical implications: results show that nature and science are quite diversified with regard to document types. in bibliometric assessments, where publications in nature and science play a role, other document types than article and review might therefore be taken into account. originality/value: results highlight the importance of other document types than article and review in nature and science. large differences are also found when comparing the country document type profiles of the three journals with the corresponding profiles in all web of science journals. |
英文摘要 |
purpose: in this contribution, we want to detect the document type profiles of the three prestigious journals nature, science, and proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states (pnas) with regard to two levels: journal and country. design/methodology/approach: using relative values based on fractional counting, we investigate the distribution of publications across document types at both the journal and country level, and we use (cosine) document type profile similarity values to compare pairs of publication years within countries. findings: nature and science mainly publish editorial material, article, news item and letter, whereas the publications of pnas are heavily concentrated on article. the shares of article for nature and science are decreasing slightly from 1999 to 2014, while the corresponding shares of editorial material are increasing. most studied countries focus on article and letter in nature, but on letter in science and pnas. the document type profiles of some of the studied countries change to a relatively large extent over publication years. research limitations: the main limitation of this research concerns the web of science classification of publications into document types. since the analysis of the paper is based on document types of web of science, the classification in question is not free from errors, and the accuracy of the analysis might be affected. practical implications: results show that nature and science are quite diversified with regard to document types. in bibliometric assessments, where publications in nature and science play a role, other document types than article and review might therefore be taken into account. originality/value: results highlight the importance of other document types than article and review in nature and science. large differences are also found when comparing the country document type profiles of the three journals with the corresponding profiles in all web of science journals. |
学科主题 | 新闻学与传播学 ; 图书馆、情报与文献学 |
收录类别 | 其他 |
原文出处 | http://www.chinalibraries.net |
语种 | 英语 |
内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
源URL | [http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/8730] |
专题 | 文献情报中心_Journal of Data and Information Science_Journal of Data and Information Science-2016 |
作者单位 | 1.National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3.School of Education and Communication in Engineering Sciences (ECE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm 100 44, Sweden |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Jielan Ding,Per Ahlgren,Liying Yang,et al. Document Type Profiles in Nature, Science, and PNAS: Journal and Country Level[J]. journal of data and information science,2016,1(3):27-41. |
APA | Jielan Ding,Per Ahlgren,Liying Yang,&Ting Yue.(2016).Document Type Profiles in Nature, Science, and PNAS: Journal and Country Level.journal of data and information science,1(3),27-41. |
MLA | Jielan Ding,et al."Document Type Profiles in Nature, Science, and PNAS: Journal and Country Level".journal of data and information science 1.3(2016):27-41. |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论